Head to head

cc-connect vs planning-with-files

5 of 12 recorded facts differ. Everything below is source-reported with a capture date. Niched has not published a buyer verdict for this pair, so nothing here declares a winner. A winner only exists inside a defined buyer niche with stated constraints.

cc-connect

Bridge local AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Codex) to messaging platforms (Feishu/Lark, DingTalk, Slack, Telegram, Discord, LINE, WeChat Work). Chat with your AI dev assistant from anywhere — no public IP required for most platforms.

Visit ↗

planning-with-files

Persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents and long-running tasks. Crash-proof markdown plans, session recovery after /clear and compaction, per-turn re-injection against context rot, deterministic completion gate. Manus-style. Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Kiro, OpenCode and 60+ agents via the Agent Skills standard.

Visit ↗

Every recorded fact

Show differences only
Factcc-connectplanning-with-files
Official SDK installs, 30 daysNot recordedNot recorded
SDK evidence capturedNot recordedNot recorded
GitHub stars14.6K25.9K
Forks1.4K2.2K
Open issues5347
Last commit8 days ago8 days ago
Primary languageGoPython
LicenseNot recordedMIT License
Open sourceYesYes
Pricing modelNot recordedNot recorded
FoundedNot recordedNot recorded
CategoriesAI coding assistants & agentsAI coding assistants & agents

Where both compete

Both products are placed in AI coding assistants & agents. A category organises the market; it carries no score. See all cc-connect alternatives.