Head to head

claude-tap vs planning-with-files

4 of 12 recorded facts differ. Everything below is source-reported with a capture date. Niched has not published a buyer verdict for this pair, so nothing here declares a winner. A winner only exists inside a defined buyer niche with stated constraints.

claude-tap

Intercept and inspect Coding Agent API traffic from Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Cursor CLI, OpenCode, Kimi/Kimi Code, Pi, and Hermes in a local trace viewer.

Visit ↗

planning-with-files

Persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents and long-running tasks. Crash-proof markdown plans, session recovery after /clear and compaction, per-turn re-injection against context rot, deterministic completion gate. Manus-style. Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Kiro, OpenCode and 60+ agents via the Agent Skills standard.

Visit ↗

Every recorded fact

Show differences only
Factclaude-tapplanning-with-files
Official SDK installs, 30 daysNot recordedNot recorded
SDK evidence capturedNot recordedNot recorded
GitHub stars2.9K25.9K
Forks2542.2K
Open issues227
Last commityesterday8 days ago
Primary languagePythonPython
LicenseMIT LicenseMIT License
Open sourceYesYes
Pricing modelNot recordedNot recorded
FoundedNot recordedNot recorded
CategoriesAI coding assistants & agentsAI coding assistants & agents

Where both compete

Both products are placed in AI coding assistants & agents. A category organises the market; it carries no score. See all claude-tap alternatives.