Head to head

continue vs planning-with-files

6 of 12 recorded facts differ. Everything below is source-reported with a capture date. Niched has not published a buyer verdict for this pair, so nothing here declares a winner. A winner only exists inside a defined buyer niche with stated constraints.

continue

open-source coding agent. continue is open source, written primarily in TypeScript, released under Apache License 2.0. Its repository has 35.2K GitHub stars and 5.1K forks, and was last committed to within the last two weeks. Niched places it in AI coding assistants & agents.

Visit ↗

planning-with-files

Persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents and long-running tasks. Crash-proof markdown plans, session recovery after /clear and compaction, per-turn re-injection against context rot, deterministic completion gate. Manus-style. Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Kiro, OpenCode and 60+ agents via the Agent Skills standard.

Visit ↗

Differences only

Show all 12 rows
Factcontinueplanning-with-files
GitHub stars35.2K25.9K
Forks5.2K2.2K
Open issues9507
Last commityesterday8 days ago
Primary languageTypeScriptPython
LicenseApache License 2.0MIT License

Where both compete

Both products are placed in AI coding assistants & agents. A category organises the market; it carries no score. See all continue alternatives.