paseo
Orchestrate multiple coding agents from desktop and mobile
Visit ↗Head to head
paseo vs planning-with-files
6 of 12 recorded facts differ. Everything below is source-reported with a capture date. Niched has not published a buyer verdict for this pair, so nothing here declares a winner. A winner only exists inside a defined buyer niche with stated constraints.
planning-with-files
Persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents and long-running tasks. Crash-proof markdown plans, session recovery after /clear and compaction, per-turn re-injection against context rot, deterministic completion gate. Manus-style. Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Kiro, OpenCode and 60+ agents via the Agent Skills standard.
Visit ↗Differences only
Show all 12 rows| Fact | paseo | planning-with-files |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 11.8K | 25.9K |
| Forks | 1.2K | 2.2K |
| Open issues | 633 | 7 |
| Last commit | yesterday | 8 days ago |
| Primary language | TypeScript | Python |
| License | Other | MIT License |
Where both compete
Both products are placed in AI coding assistants & agents. A category organises the market; it carries no score. See all paseo alternatives.